Problem A. 909. (May 2025)
A. 909. Prove that for any positive integer \(\displaystyle N\), there exists a positive integer \(\displaystyle n>2\) such that the difference between any two distinct prime factors of \(\displaystyle n^3-1\) is at least \(\displaystyle N\).
(7 pont)
Deadline expired on June 10, 2025.
We know that \(\displaystyle n^3-1=(n-1)(n^2+n+1)\). Let \(\displaystyle n=m+1\), then the second factor can be rewritten as \(\displaystyle m^2+3m+3\). Now note that
$$\begin{align*} (m^2-3m+3)(m^2+3m+3)&=m^4-3m^2+9\\ (m^2+3)(m^4-3m^2+9)&=m^6+27\\ (m^6+27)(m^6-27)&=m^{12}-3^6, \end{align*}$$therefore if \(\displaystyle p\neq 3\) divides \(\displaystyle m^2+3m+3\), then \(\displaystyle m^{12}\equiv 3^6\) mod \(\displaystyle p\). Let's choose \(\displaystyle m\) to be a power of 3: \(\displaystyle m=3^\alpha\), then \(\displaystyle 3^{12\alpha} \equiv 3^6\) mod \(\displaystyle p\), end therefore \(\displaystyle d|12\alpha-6=6(2\alpha-1)\). Now let's choose \(\displaystyle 2\alpha-1\) also as a power of 3, so let \(\displaystyle 2\alpha-1=3^\beta\). Then \(\displaystyle d|2\cdot 3^{\beta+1}\), thus \(\displaystyle d=3^\gamma\) or \(\displaystyle d=2\cdot 3^\gamma\) for some \(\displaystyle \gamma\le \beta+1\). We will prove that \(\displaystyle \gamma=\beta+1\). Let's assume for the sake of contradiction that \(\displaystyle \gamma\le \beta\).
Case 1. If \(\displaystyle d=3^\gamma\), then \(\displaystyle d|2\alpha-1\), so \(\displaystyle 3^{2\alpha-1}\equiv 1\) mod \(\displaystyle p\). Therefore
\(\displaystyle m^2+3m+3=3^{2\alpha}+3^{\alpha+1}+3\equiv 3+3^{\alpha+1}+3\equiv 3\cdot(3^\alpha+2)\,\text{mod}\,p, \)
so \(\displaystyle 3^{\alpha}\equiv -2\) mod \(\displaystyle p\). However, this implies \(\displaystyle 3^{2\alpha}\equiv 4\) mod \(\displaystyle p\), which contradicts \(\displaystyle 3^{2\alpha-1}\equiv 1\) mod \(\displaystyle p\) (which implies \(\displaystyle 3^{2\alpha}\equiv 3\) mod \(\displaystyle p\).
Case 2. If \(\displaystyle d=2\cdot 3^\gamma\), then \(\displaystyle 3^d-1=(3^{d/2}-1)(3^{d/2}+1)\), and \(\displaystyle p\) cannot divide the first factor by the definition of the order, therefore it divides the second factor. This implies \(\displaystyle 3^{3^\gamma}\equiv 3^{d/2}\equiv -1\) mod \(\displaystyle p\). Since \(\displaystyle 3^{2\alpha-1}=3^{3^\beta}\) is an odd power of \(\displaystyle 3^{3^\gamma}\), it's also -1 mod \(\displaystyle p\). Thus
\(\displaystyle m^2+3m+3=3^{2\alpha}+3^{\alpha+1}+3\equiv -3+3^{\alpha+1}+3\equiv 3^{\alpha+1}\,\text{mod}\,p, \)
which is a contradiction.
Thus \(\displaystyle 3^{\beta+1}\) must divide \(\displaystyle d\), which divides \(\displaystyle p-1\) because of Fermat's little theorem. So we have proved that every prime factor different from 3 must be 1 modulo \(\displaystyle 3^{\beta+1}\), so any two prime factors of \(\displaystyle n^3-1\) must differ by at least \(\displaystyle 3^{\beta}-2\), which finishes our proof, since \(\displaystyle \beta\) can be chosen arbitrarily.
Statistics:
8 students sent a solution. 7 points: Bodor Mátyás, Forrai Boldizsár, Tianyue DAI, Varga Boldizsár, Xiaoyi Mo. 0 point: 3 students.
Problems in Mathematics of KöMaL, May 2025